|
|
TEXAS
Texas Legislature Online
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/
Texas Education Code sections 21.032 & 21.033
Legal Requirements for home schooling in Texas:
1. Compulsory Attendance ages are 6 through 17. This means that when a child turns 6 he must be "in school" and, if not enrolled in a traditional school, the following requirements apply:
A. The home school must be run in a bona fide manner (not a sham or subterfuge.)
B. A written curriculum (from any source including video or computer) must be used and must cover the basic subjects of reading, spelling, grammar, math and a course in good citizenship. The child is considered to be in a private school as a homeschool is a private school as upheld by Leeper v. Arlington Independent School District, No. 17-88761-85, D. Texas, April 13, 1987
C. Parents must reasonably cooperate with any reasonable inquiry from an attendance officer.
2. The Texas legislature has not defined private or parochial school in the Education Code . Additionally, the legislature has given the TEA and State Board of Education authority just over Public schools, not over private or parochial schools. Under the compulsory attendance laws, there is a requirement of 170 days of attendance but this only applies to PUBLIC schools, not to private or parochial schools.
3. There are no current testing requirements nor or you required to register your home school with the school district under current Texas law.
You are not required to file any papers or notify anyone that you are homeschooling your children in Texas. If they are already enrolled in a public school, you can tell the school's office that the child is going to be homeschooled or is going to be attending a private school. In Texas, a homeschool is a private school. Some districts may want to give you a hard time, but you have every legal right to homeschool without their blessings.
HOMESCHOOL COURT CASE
GARY W. LEEPER ET AL VERSUS ARLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL
FINAL JUDGEMENT SEPTEMBER 4TH, 1987
"It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that a school-age child residing in the state of Texas who is pursuing under the direction of a parent or parents or one standing in parental authority in or through the child's home in a bona fide (good faith, not a sham or subterfuge) manner a curriculum consisting of books, workbooks, or written materials including that which appears on an electronic screen of either a computer or video tape monitor, or any combination of the preceding from (1) either one of a private or parochial school which exists apart from the child home or (2) which has been developed or obtained from any source, said curriculum designed to meet basic education goals of reading, spelling, grammar, mathematics and a study of good citizenship, is in attendance upon a private or parochial school within the meaning of Section 21.033 (a) (1) of the Texas Education Code and exempt from the requirements of compulsory attendance at a public school . . ."
"This judgement does not preclude the Texas Education agency, the Commissioner of Education or the State Board of Education from suggesting to the public school attendance officers lawful methods, including but not limited to inquiry concerning curricula and standardized test scores, in order to ascertain if there is compliance with the decalsration contained in this judgement. However, this judgement is not to be interpreted as requiring standardized test scores in order for there to be compliance with interpretation made by the court of section 21.033 (a) (1) of the Texas Education Code . . ."
Chas. J. Murray-District Court Judge
17th Judicial District Court of Texas
Leeper Case Upheld on Appeal.
On Wednesday, June 15, 1994, the Texas Supreme Court unanimously upheld the appeal of the Arlington v. Leeper case, which defined the current home-schooling rights of parents in the state of Texas. In a 30 page ruling, the court upheld the lower court rulings which said that students attending legitimate home schools are not required to attend public schools. The court said that the Texas Education Agency had no legal basis for the prosecution of 150 homeschooling families and that legitimate home schools are exempt from the state's compulsory attendance law.
The Supreme Court agreed with the district court's ruling that a home school was considered legitimate if parents used some sort of curriculum consisting of books, workbooks or other written materials and that they met "basic education goals" by teaching reading, spelling, grammar, mathematics and good citizenship. Once that standard is met, the state's authority ends, although the district court said school officials could ask home-school parents about curricula and standardized tests.
The Supreme Court specifically said Wednesday that the Texas Education Agency could request evidence of standardized test, even though home-school parents are not required to give such tests. The Court also said that any new rules on home schools written by the State Board of Education would be subject to judicial review. The Supreme Court also lifted, as unnecessary, a permanent injunction barring school districts from charging parents who educate their children at home with criminal violations. The court said that Texas law was never intended to criminalize home schooling and noted that home schools were a historical practicality for many Texas families in the 20th century.
And, finally, in an 8-1 decision, the Court upheld the ruling that the state pay $360,000 in attorney fees for the plaintiffs. (The above article compiled from various news sources.)